Yokohama Tires Suck




REAL-LIFE HORROR STORIES FROM OTHER YOKOHAMA TIRE VICTIMS
Apparently quite a few other Yokohama tires owners are disgusted too. These are real comments from other Yokohame victims. I couldn't possibly make this much stuff up...


Won't buy Yokohamas now

I was going to buy a new set of high end Yokohama tires for my 2001 Cadillac STS, but now I am having second thoughts. Most likely I will not buy them now because I will always have this website (and your terrible incident) in the back of my mind.

- Dale Bible


Been there, done that, not buying Yoko again

Good luck with that. I had a set of Yoko ES100's that I wasn't too happy with, but nothing dangerous. Having fought battles with corporations before, I wish you luck. Unfortunately, stories like this seem more common nowadays.

I bought a allegedly new car a few years ago that didn't turn out to be quite so new. It took over a year of effort and a lawyer to get any satisfaction. You'd think that if a company was caught red-handed screwing you over they'd bend over backwards to make it right. Not so!

For the record, Yokohama (if you happen to wander in here), I might have purchased from you again despite my disappointment with the ES100's (considering track tires next spring). After seeing this, I'm sure I will not purchase any tires from you in the future.

- Geoff



Five flats and one slice

I have a 06 Toyota Rav 4 with Yokohama Geolanders on it. I have had the car less than a year and just had my 5th flat 4 of them have been caused by small rocks making holes in the tire. On one tire a rock about an inch and a half long sliced a 2" cut into tire. Still have a tire with the rock less than 1 inch in dia. stuck in it. Any suggestions on how to get action from Toyota or Yokohama?

-Adam


Bubble damage

One tire developed a bubble on the inside wall after 17,000 miles which was discovered only because a nail was removed from the tread. This could have resulted in a problem had a blow out happened on the freeway. The tires were never over- or under-inflated.

-Tom


Tire shreads right off the rim

I came across your web site when I was researching Yokohama tires. Today the rear tire completely fell off the rim. It's my wife's MR2 Spyder, but her son was driving and managed to safely pull over. Check out the pics of the tire. I got the tires at Discount Tires with a store warranty. What do you recommend I do with this circumstance? I don't want anyone to get hurt, want both my tires to be replaced, don't want "Spoilage of Evidence" either. Someone could get killed and it very well could have been my wife! Where do you recommend we go from here?

-Roger


Three bad tires, one mound of hassle

My new 2002 Toyota MR2 Spyder came equipped with 4 Yokohama tires. I was pleased at the outset because I have always heard great things about Yokohama. Within one year, a huge bulge appeared on the back passenger tire. I called around to find a certified Yokohama dealer. I waited weeks to have my "special" type of tire ordered (205/55/R15/85V) and when I went to have it replaced I was told that it would be covered under the one year, 36,000 mile warranty. This was after the "certified" dealer reviewed my damage. I agreed to have the tire replaced.

When I went to pick up my keys, the "certified" dealer told me that I owed $134. I told him I thought it was under warranty. He told me that I had to pay him first and he would submit the tire and a claim to Yokohama. If Yokohama decided to honor the warranty, they would cut the certified dealer a check and he would refund my money. As this seemed like a very strange arrangement, I required that he provide me a copy of the Yokohama claim form. For the next several months, I proceeded to call Yokohama to follow-up on the status. The first 30 or so phone calls placed were never returned or I was not connected to anyone that could help me.

After I finally reached the person I was told would be my "contact" he could not find the claim number in the system. He told me that he was not the person to speak to and referred me to someone else. The new customer service rep told me that the claim number was not in the system because it could take 3 months for Yokohama to actually receive the tire from the dealer and then they have to test it in their engineering department. The woman went on to tell me that she doesn't believe it would be covered under warranty anyway because bulges are "road hazards" and they doubted that my tires were properly inflated, rotated, aligned etc.

I told her that I don't deny that I drive the vehicle on the road and I expect that tires would be able to withstand normal (non-winter!) road conditions for more than 17,000 miles. 7 months later, I still have no status on the tire warranty, from my "contacts" at Yokohama or their authorized dealer. Last week, I was turning a corner in a residential neighborhood, a car was driving on my side of the street. To avoid a collision, I drove up over the curb corner (not insanely uncommon). I heard a very loud rush of air and realized that my tire had blown. The same exact tire that was replaced 7 months and 6,000 miles previous.

When I changed the tire, I saw that the damage was a crack across the wall of the tire, not a hole or a puncture, but a split. This, of course, is irreparable and I will be replacing the tires again. This time, I will be replacing both back tires with Toyo tires. In a few months, I will have the Yokohamas removed from the front as well as tread is very badly worn already (total mileage: 23,000). As my vehicle is rear wheel drive and my tires were supposedly speed rated for V, I am going to the expense to remove this product from my vehicle NOW to prevent a possibly serious accident in the future.

Total cost to me: New tire round one: $134 New tires round two, entire back set of different manufacturer: $178 New donut spare due to the ridiculous amount of time it takes to order a new tire: $100 Two very nice convertible driving days lost. A LOT of hassle.

-Amy


Four tires in dangerous condition

What a mess. I have a 2002 Subaru Forester that was purchased from Gillman Subaru brand new, with installed Yokohama Tires (P215/60R 16 94H Geolander Radial Tubeless All-Season Tires. I have 36,000 on my vehicle, consisting of all city driving (freeways, streets, etc). My car has independent four wheel suspension/four wheel drive, but I do not drive on ANY gravel, grass, or dirt roads or over any debris.

All FOUR of my tires are in dangerous condition and need to be replaced. These are $110 tires ($110 PER TIRE) and should not be unusable after only 36,000 of normal, slow, safe, city driving! When I attempted to utilize the warranty, I was given the run around. I have only used between 25-30% of the usable tread. I was willing to replace the tires and pay 25-30% of each tire to cover the cost of the tread I used, but I have had no luck working with the manufacturer or dealer.

I have performed all maintenance on my vehicle including proper alignment/balancing, proper tire inflation, etc. Some of the tires have uneven wear, two have wall cracking, and one is essentially shredding itself. This is absurd. Why spend $400-$500 on a set of "high performance" tires MADE for four-wheel-drive vehicles if they can't last 36,000 miles? These tires are either defective and/or inferior, and the manufacturer is attempting to avoid their liability and legal accountability under the law and under the warranty. I have never had similar problems with ANY tires I have previously owned/driven on.

I am driving on four dangerous tires. Does Yokohama want to replace these defective/inferior tires now, or after they result in an accident/injury?

-Lori


Separated and screwed

I was on my way to work via the Garden State Parkway. I was driving below the speed limit, which is 65 mph, when I suddenly heard a loud bang. Instantly my fender was flopping in the wind and my rear-view mirror was no longer attached to my car. I promptly slowed down and then pulled into the shoulder. Once I was in the shoulder I got out of my car to assess what had happened.

My Yokohama tire was still inflated and hissing out air but the tread had come completely off. The New Jersey State Police arrived within 5 min of the incident. The police officer reviewed the facts and stated, The tire must have been defective for the entire tread to have come off. I explained to the officer that my car had four new Yokohama tires on it when the car was purchased from Freehold Toyota and that three of them had formed bubbles in the actual tread itself forcing me to replace the tires.

I hadn't had the time nor the money to replace my spare being that I had three defective tires within two months and now the fourth tire was defective, all of which were the same Yokohama make and model.

Before any work was done I took pictures with my digital camera to have a visual record of how much damage this tire had caused. I then proceeded to get two separate estimates, which were both in excess of $2000. I called several certified Yokohama dealers to see if there had been a recall on these tires. I'm sure you would be pleased to hear that everyone I spoke with said, Yokohama has no recalls because they are one of the best tires made.

Two of the dealers that made this statement were in shock when I brought the actual tire to them to show them what had happened to the tread. These same dealers then proceeded to state, That is NOT supposed to happen. And Wow that is scary. I am glad that I was able to gain control of my vehicle and not crash my car into anybody or anything. I am equally glad that the tread, which came flying off and took off my mirror didn't come flying into my open window and take off my head.

Although this experience was frightening and nerve racking I'm not currently seeking monetary settlements for mental anguish, towing fees and or missed work. I am however asking that Yokohama pay for the damage that their defective tire caused to my vehicle. I have enclosed pictures of the damage, two estimates, the actual tire and the police report that was filed. It is my hope that this matter will be resolved as quickly and efficiently as possible. I would rather not have to take legal action as a result of Yokohamas denial of responsibility for this claim but if I am not completely satisfied with the outcome of Yokohamas action taken to redeem this situation I will be left no choice but to do so.

I sent Yokohama all the information that they requested and they gave me a very vague explanation as to what it could have been (three different scenarios): 1. Over-inflation; 2. Under-inflation; 3. Sidewall puncture. I sent the tire to them and there was not a puncture in the sidewall when I sent it.

-Justin


FED UP

I have a 06 Suzuki Grand Vitari and i took it Sept 07 for inspection and failed for tires with 10,000 miles on it. Called the dealership and they said bring it in and told me when it got shipped over it it was knocked out of allignment so they would put 4 new tires and allignment for free. GREAT.

Now here I am July 08 and tires shot again with 9500 miles on the tires. Took to dealership and they said nothing they can do. NOT out of allignment but agree tires are shot and will not pass inspection. THERE IS NO REASON THAT A PERSON SHOULD HAVE TO REPLACE TIRES THAT EARLY. I do not drive a lot. I am 40. Fed up.

P.S. I LOVE THE VEHICLE HATE THE TIRES!!!

Karen, Latrobe PA


Separation puts family at risk

The Yokohama tire that were on the Mazda Mpv 2000 -- the tire separated from the belts. Mazda said it was Yokohama's fault. Mazda put a 215 tire on the van when it should have been a 265 tire. The van was too heavy for the small tires. Transport Canada has also been contracted about this problem. I have replaced four tires on my one-year-old vehicle. Two tires are Michelin and two are still Yokohama tires. These Yokohama tires will have to be replaced because the same problem will happen.

At Performance Mazda nothing was said when they replaced two of the tires. They just noted that they were not covered under warranty. Again nothing was said about the wrong size of tires and they put on the wrong size again. We have pay out over $550 for tires to find out that all four tires are the wrong size and we will have the same problem with in a year.

Mazda sent a copy of my letter and their letter to Regis Benchimol at Yokohama tires. We waited weeks and never heard back from Yokohama. Yokohama and Mazda put my family and others at risk by having the wrong tires on our van. The tires could have separated at anytime. Transport Canada is looking into the problem but I believe we have another Firestone problem on our hands and people need to know that the tires on their van may separate and cost them their lives.

-Sharon


Poor quality tires, worse quality customer service

I bought a set of Yokahama AVC ES100 245/40/20 tires. They seemed to ride fine when I first put them on but after the first tire rotation I ended up putting the 2 bad tires on front. The shaking was so bad it would about shake the steering wheel out of your hand. I had them rebalanced 3 times thinking that maybe I had a bent wheel but no one ever said anything was wrong. Finally I took it to the car manufacturing plant that I work for and they did a road variance test and found that two of the tires were not even round and were 3 times more than what they should be. I called Yokahama and was told they wouldn't accept the test done by the auto plant, that I would have to take it to one of their distributors and have one of their high school drop outs check it. They were wanting me to pay another $100 top have the tires tested and I already have $250 in them. So I'm gonna remove the tires and replace them with Firestones and let everyone I can know at the quality and customer service of Yokohama.

-Kevin H.


Scared to death

I needed to buy new tires and went to a tire supplier store. Not knowing very much about tire purchasing, I listened to the service manager. He described several options available as to choice of tires. Although he did not recommend a choice, he said he liked Yokohama and I went for it. After reading your web site, I'm scared to death wondering if that delamination is going to occur with my new tires. I wish I had had the sense to question before I bought.

-Margaret C.


CONSIDERING buying Yokohamas until now

I just had a flat tire and was CONSIDERING buying a new set of Yokohama tires for my SUV. I don't want to roll my vehicle at 70 MPH with my family! Thanks for your story and I will remain a loyal Bridgestone customer. They have always treated me well.

-Darrell Jones, Flagstaff, AZ


I will never by Yokohamas again

Just wanted to pass along my own experiences with Yokohama tires...

I, too, thought Yokohama tires were supposed to be good. So, I purchased a set for my car. Less than a year (and 15,000 miles) after purchase, they wouldn't pass inspection. The belts had separated in some of the tires and they were wearing unevenly. I contacted Yokohama and they offered to have them shipped to their facilities for inspection. They picked them up (at their expense, which was nice), but their examination made it sound like my car was the reason for their tires failing. The funny thing is I replaced the Yokohamas with a brand I had never heard of before, Hankook. I'm now on my third year with these tires (about 40,000 miles) and they're still going great. I will never by Yokohamas again. If I buy a new car that comes from the manufacturer with Yokohamas, I will make sure they are replaced before I take delivery of the vehicle.

-Brian


Worn out in under 25,000 miles

A minor problem compared to yours but I just want to join the Avoid Yokohama chorus.

I purchased a set of Yokohama ES100 V rated 195/55r15 on APRIL 11, 2005. I have LESS THAN 25,000 miles on the tires and they are so worn that they will not meet PA inspection requirements.

-Michael Knies


Yokohama doesn't stand behind its product.

Thanks for your article on the Yokohama Tires. I drive a 2006 VW Jeta TDI. I am due for the first set of tire replacement. I started shopping around and trying to decide what tire to put on the vehicle. One dealer suggested the Yokohama AVID. It is a rather expensive tire but certainly not un-affordable. In-as-much as I drive this vehicle 45 - 50,000 miles per year in my line of work, I wanted to put a quality tire on the vehicle.

I agree, there is no tire that is trouble free, but part of a "trouble free" product is a manufacturer that stands behind the product in the event of a failure. Obviously Yokohama failed to do so.

Based on what I read, I will go to another brand. Thanks

-Brian Cook

P.S. Please forward my e-mail to Yokohama.


Disgusting bulges

Hi, we have 2 Yokohama tires bulging in left front and rear left, after only putting a mere 8000 miles on our suzuki aerio. We are disgusted. We have digital pictures of these tires. Yokohama refuses to honor their warrantee in a way that doesn't break our bank. They wanted 72 bucks for FED EX shipping of the tires up front, and they said they would only replace one of the tires although two are clearly manufacturing defects. Our dealership person attested to that.

Is there any way you know how to get these people to keep their warrantee guarantee?

-GRegards, regory, Iowa


Delamination and deception



I've been dealing with Yokohama the last couple of months now. My son rolled his truck, when the front driverside tire deflated for some unknown reason? He just bought the truck "Certified 2003 Toyota Tundra 5 months prior" from a Toyota dealership. His truck was totalled, minor injuries, but on-going back pain. "I feel your's and your son's pain". I too contacted Yokohama, they sent me a return package to send off the tire and a claim form to fill out and to send documentation such as pictures, Insurance statement...ect. I contacted them left several messages to see if they received the tire, but no return call. About 1 1/2 months later I received a letter from them, stating they received my tire but no documentation!! I called them back several time, not leaving a message, kept trying until I finally spoke to Winifred, the claim examiner. I asked her, how did they know that was my tire, if they did not receive my documentation, that was in the large bag with the tire!!! She PAUSED, and said she needs to call Yokahama in Calif where they received the tire. A week passed, I called back, Winifred said she still had not heard anything, she was going to call back again. She called me back later that day, "and guess what" they found my documentation. Now I'm waiting to hear back from them. The tire was inspected on Dec 11th, but a decision had not been made yet, since my documentation was lost at the time of inspection, but now incredibly found. I'll let you know how it goes. I support you 100%. Good Luck Cindy.

-Sincerely, Lin Pacinelli


More defects and deception

I think your website say's it all! We too had our tire looked at by a certified tech who said the inner liner seal "or tape" that seals the tire together was peeling "coming apart". Which never should happen. We took every angle of the inside and outside of the tire. I figured that they would of told me that they lost the tire not the documentation! It's really funny, because I had called them prior, to them saying they didn't receive the paper's, and the Tire was scheduled to be inspected a few day's later. Then few day's after they inspected it, is when I received the letter saying they didn't receive the paper work. So I already new they had both the tire and documentation! I'm sure we will get the run around, haven't heard anything yet.

Will Yokohama Care! I don't think so, they have already proven that by starting the process off with BS claims, of no documentation! I've enclosed a few pic's for you, your more then welcome to post. I'll keep you informed.

-Anonymous by request


Similar sucky experience and spreading the word too

I had a similar experience. The local dealer started giving me the run around ~ "it must have been underflated, must have hit a curb", etc. I knew (from your web site and others) what I was up against, and really didn't care to argue. The tires were on the car when I bought it two years ago (a '99 Lexus), and I got two years out of them. Since there was no damage (AND I WASN'T KILLED), I just pretty much blew it off and ordered new (Goodyear Triple Treads) from The Tire Rack.

At 56, I realize the futility of "fighting city hall", which is what this amounts to. I know I'll never win THIS fight. I DO still have the carcass and sidewalls, so I have apparently not "given up", but unless I'm notified about a class action suit, and I can present evidence, I'll probably throw it all away after my wife gets after me a few more times.

Believe me though, I AM spreading the word though. I publish a newsletter that about a hundred guys in town read every week, and I don't let anyone forget about how YOKOHAMA TIRES SUCK!!! Good Luck!

-Mike Thorsrud


Dangerous to drive in the snow. Never buying Yokohama again

I am the owner of Yokohama Avid Touring tires. They are guaranteed for 80,000 miles, I only have 38,000 on them and they are terrible for driving in snow and rain. They are dangerous to drive in the snow. Tires with this many miles on them and rated as they are, should have a lot of life left in them. I will never, ever buy Yokohama tires again. Good for you and your site, let everyone know what rotten tires these are.

-Mike


Sue the tires off this company

You have every right to be mad as hell and I hope you don't have to take it anymore. I hope you can find an honest, energetic lawyer who will see the merits in this case and sue the tires off this company. Some lawyers enjoy the challenge others work for 33% contingency of the settlement. Best of luck!

-Al Hubbard


Catastrophic failure

Yesterday, while driving on the freeway at 75 m.p.h., my left rear tire (a Yokohama) had a catastrophic failure. The outside totally separated from the inside and immediately went flat. I don't know how I managed to get from the inside lane to the outside lane and stopped, but I did. With no damage, even to the rim. If this tire had been on the front, I know there would have been no controlling it.

I know I am extremely lucky ~ tomorrow I plan to ask a local dealer for a new set of tires. I will let you know what happens.

-Mike T.


Deadly delamation

Last year this time we had a good family friend of ours die in an accident which as caused by a total delamination of the rear passenger side Yokohama tire. The family is thinking of filing a lawsuit against Yokohama in efforts protect others from similar disasters. Do you know of any other Yokomama delamination victims?

We plan on calling in a tire expert to look at the tire to see if he can point out the cause of the delamination. I am sure there have been suits filed against them, but I am not aware of the outcome. Any advice or help you can give us will be much appreciated in helping us in our endeavors on behalf of our friend who passed away.

-Name withheld by request


Premature wear. Will not do business again.

I purchased tires from Flynn's approximately a year ago. After only 13,000 miles of what I thought was a 40.000 mile warranty, they wore out. They say there was no alignment done to the front and the backs were over inflated. There was an alignment done and frequent oil changes during which the tire pressure was checked. I have the paperwork proving this, but, because Yokohama is across the country, they are saying that there is nothing they can do. How convenient. Now, if I had bought discount tires for basic driving, OK. These tires, however, are designed for all terrains with an extra deep center groove for traction. To me that translates to a heavier wear tire, not 1 year throw-aways. As far as I am concerned, I will not do business with either of these companies again, and will inform every friend, relative, car buff and tuner enthusiast I know to stay away from them. It's a shame, that a person has to get a lawyer just to make people honor their own warranted promises.

MT


New tires, old problem

I recently bought yokohama tires and found that I had a bubble in one of the tires within 30 km. There was a defect in the chafer of the tire in the area of the bubble. What are my options as to replacement by the company? Is it common to have this defect in yokohama tires?

Vkram


Tire disentegrated

The driver's side rear tire disintegrated, which almost caused the consumer to lose control of the vehicle.

JB


Blow out miracle but no more Yokohama tires for my family and friends!

This past weekend, after graduating from college, my daughter and her aunt were traveling on California Interstate 5 when the passenger-side tire, a Yokohama AS430, blew out. It was a miracle that no accident happened. The whole wall on the tire broke open. The tire had less than 15,000 mile on it. I have a digital picture of it; it's pretty scary. I have contacted the shop where I bought the set of tires from, but have not heard back from them yet. However, based on what I have read on this site, I am not holding my breath that the shop or Yokohama will fess up to any problem. No more Yokohama tires for my family and friends!

Javad, San Jose, CA


Tire blows after 2,600 miles

I bought a 2009 Subaru Forester in May 2008 that came with Yokohama Geolander tires as original equipment.  I had been checking the pressure regularly, since a pressure warning light on the dashboard intermittently came on.  All checks showed the pressure was stable and within specs for the vehicle and tires.  The last check was the day of an out-of town trip.   On that trip, the right rear tire blew after only 2600 miles while changing lanes within the speed limit on Hwy 80 in Northern California.   It looked as if the blowout involved the sidewalls and not the tread.  This was late on on a Friday night.  Because the tire was so new, when I visited a tire dealer on Saturday morning I was told I would need to wait until Tuesday to get an exact replacement.  Because I was far out of town and this is an all-wheel drive vehicle I wound up replacing all four tires with a Goodyear model.  I got an $84 credit against the blown tire, but only a $20 trade-in each for the three other tires.  Needless to say, I will never purchase a Yokohama tire again.

Jim in Northern California


Tire failure within 6,000 miles. Buyer beware...this is a ripoff

I purchased 4 Yokohama tires from Tirerack.com for my Mercedes SLK. Within 6000 miles, the sidewall of the right rear tire began to fail, forming a bubble which causes an imminent blowout. The tires still look brand new, have never hit anything (ground clearance in an SLK is 4 inches...you would wreck the car first), never drove at excessive speed. This is a weekend car that gets about 3000 miles PER YEAR.

Tirerack has refused to reimburse me for the tire(s), saying that it must have been something I did to the tire to damage it.

Tirerack says that I can, at my own cost, ship the tire back to them and they will inspect it, and if THEY think there is a problem, they'll send it to Yokohama, who will also inspect it, and who will, entirely at their discretion, decide if they will reimburse me. Tirerack continued to insist that I did something to damage this tire, WITHOUT EVEN SEEING IT!!!! They simply don't care, obviously, if they sell defective tires.

What a joke. Essentially, what is clearly a manufacturing defect is not covered by either Tirerack or Yokohama. So, this is my last purchase of Yokohama tires, and my last purchase from tirerack.com Be aware: Yokohama is selling defective tires, tirerack knows it, and simply does not care. Buy beware...this is a ripoff.

Greg, Birmingham, AL


Lousy tires fail at 8,000 miles

I purchased a new Subaru Forrester in December of 07. I do a lot of driving both highway and city. My Forrester came with Yokohama Geolander G900. The car has 8,000 miles an it and in the last month I have had to replace two of the tires.

The first tire had belt separation which had to be replaced. The second tire had a nail puncture caused a belt separation and had to be replaced. The general consensus in talking with tire retailers is that these tires are simply lousy tires that are overpriced. I would urge anyone looking to purchase tires to stay away from these. I know that the first chance I get I will replace all four tires.

Albert, Berrien Spring MI


Broken belts on two tires puts child at risk

I got out of my 7-month-old Suzuki Aerio today and noticed that both the left front and left rear tires had bulges. Obviously the belts had broken on these tires. I called Suzuki Corporate who told me it was not their issue. I called the dealership who told me they would look at it and see what (they) could do. I called Yokohama who gave me a case number and referred me to their closest dealer -- 75 unsafe freeway miles away. I picked the dealership.

The dealer said there were no abnormal wear problems, the tires were rotated balanced, etc., etc., etc. However, these tires have less than 9000 miles on them and the tires are coming apart. This was obviously a defective tire issue. These tires are supposed to be the high performance 195 55/15's that come on the sport Aerio.

What frustrates me is that I am a Technical Quality Manager and have worked in the automotive world for almost 15 years. I would NEVER allow a customer to be in a vehicle that was not safe for ANY reason. I have shut down production for less than this.

I can't understand why Yokohama is not doing something about this issue IMMEDIATELY before someone gets killed. But then I remember how many folks were killed by the exploding gas tanks on the Ford Pintos before anyone did anything and I shudder about what has happened to us as a society when our profit is more important than the lives of our customers.

I will end up going to a different tire dealer and getting four new tires on the Suzuki that are not Yokohama tires because I drive my prescious 3-year-old daughter around in this car. It will cost me at least another $400. Another day off of work, and much frustration. But all of that is small compared to the life of my daughter.

Judith, Waterloo IA

Share your story please. Email it to me here.
(Don't worry I won't post anything without your permission.)




This many people can't be wrong.
These are the horrifying testimonials you'll NEVER find in Yokohama's ads.

Read for yourself:

* Delamination
* Bubbles
* Radial pull
* Blowouts
* Premature wear
* Vibration
* Noise
* Suspicious flats
* Poor performance
* Tire failure
* Fear
* Disguist
* Anger
* Dispair
* Consume
r reviews
_____________________

The official Yokohama Sucks t-shirt as seen on eBay!

Enlarge